Montreal cognitive assessment in assessing clinical severity and white matter hyperintensity in Alzheimer's disease with normal control comparison.

PURPOSE Use Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in evaluating patients in different stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and correlate with white matter change. METHODS Ninety-seven normal controls (NC), 52 very-mild AD (clinical dementia rating [CDR] = 0.5), 48 mild AD (CDR = 1) and 38 moderate AD (CDR = 2) patients were enrolled for the MoCA, Mini- Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Cognitive Assessment Screening Instrument (CASI). White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on brain MRI were visually rated and classified as deep or periventricular WMHs. RESULTS In NC group, education (β = 0.326) but not age (β = -0.183, p = 0.069), was significantly related to MoCA score. However, while we added two points to the AD patients with less than 6 years education, the effects of education disappeared as compared with those of 7 years of education. For all educational levels, the cutoff value of MoCA for very-mild AD was 22/23 (sensitivity = 82.7%, specificity = 87.6%). No significant differences were found in the areas under the curves that differentiated NC from the patients with AD for MoCA and MMSE (differences = 0.008, p = 0.490), or for MoCA and CASI (differences = 0.023, p = 0.082). Total WMHs, frontal deep and periventricular WMHs were inversely correlated with the attention and delayed-recall subdomain. CONCLUSION The MoCA is a good clinical tool for screening very-mild stage AD if the educational effects are carefully considered. The correlation between the executive subdomains with the frontal WMHs also makes it a useful tool for detecting subtle WMHs.